How
Telecommunications Is Changing the Work Commute
"The death of distance as a determinant of the cost of
communicating will probably be the single most important force
shaping society in the first half of the next century ...
"The
result may not necessarily be less traveling - indeed when
people need to meet their electronic contacts they may actually
travel further than before - but traveling will be of a
different kind."
กก
"Death of Distance", Frances Cairncross of The Economist
September 16th & 23rd, 2002
- Ottawa, the capital city of Canada is located 200 kilometers
from Montreal. And every Monday, commuters travel to work
between both cities. A typical commute would take about two
hours. While some of these travelers commute only on Mondays and
Fridays, there are quite a few who are able to travel in both
directions on the same day. However, they do not do so every
day. Rather, they might travel every alternate day and work from
home or some other location the other day. This is not only
happening in Canada, in fact, Greyhound Bus Company seems to
have developed a nice market niche in this area. We are not
talking about thousands of daily workers, but certainly enough
workers for maglev researchers to wonder how much larger this
market can become under the right
telecommunications-transportation infrastructure conditions.
-
How has this market developed?
-
What technologies are contributing to this market?
-
Is this market an intercity travel market or a new expanded
intracity commuting market?
-
And importantly for Maglev researchers, how can an expanded
intracity Maglev commuting service facilitate this changing
nature of work to the mutual benefit of workers and
employers?
This market has blossomed since 1980. Between 1980 and 1990, the
latest decade census available, commuting between metropolitan
regions has grown twice as fast as commuting within metropolitan
regions. Two income households, declining labor tenure, housing
affordability, and the increasing specialization of work have
all contributed to this new market.
Certainly, the telecommunications revolution has spurred this
trend along. It used to be that the typical commuting range in
terms of travel time was one hour in each direction. But this
was for a five-day workweek. Today when commuters need to be at
their work office every second or third day, their daily
commuting time threshold is expanded. We really do not know
whether we should be looking at their weekly time budget or
daily time budget. But the evidence with Greyhound Buses and
Voyageur in Montreal-Ottawa and Montreal-Quebec, seem to
indicate that workers are able to tolerate longer work commutes
if not required on a daily basis.
When Francis Cairncross said that people may need to travel
further and that this travel would be of a different kind, she
certainly addressed the changing nature of the work commute
trip. Measured by distance, travel between metropolitan regions
is considered an intercity trip. However, defined by trip
purpose where travelers leave their home to get to their
workplace, such trips are classified as intracity commuting
trips. Telecommunications has liberated the workplace location
to such an extent, that it has evidently lengthened travel
behavior.
Magplane Technology Inc. has developed a research program to
probe the relationship between the changing nature of the
workplace and radically improved transportation technologies,
such as maglev. We believe that the location liberating effects
of telecommunications are expanding the employment catchment
area for specialized creative workers that conceive and build
new products for the marketplace. The spatial limit of this
range will depend not only on the reach, cost and convenience of
telecommunications and transportation technologies, but also
organizational changes pursued by employers who would benefit
most from an expanded pool of specialized labor.
The search to understand the potential of induced demand cannot
be exclusively focused on current travelers but must also
include New Economy employers to understand how an urban maglev
system can provide important labor productivity benefits.
Sources:
The Economist, Press the Flesh, not the Keyboard
Greyhound Buses, (for an intriguing look at long distance
commuting)
The Impact of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) on
Inter-Urban
Commuting and the Demand for Commercial Transportation
|